What the Faceless Corporation Means for You

Paul Omerod gives a fascinating perspective on organizations in his book Why Most Things Fail. He says that when businesses in the U.S. were given “personhood status” the age of the faceless corporation began. In the early 20th century, LLCs (limited liability corporations) could be formed and operated as something completely separate from the person(s) who incorporated them. It’s why a business can claim bankruptcy and leave the owner relatively unscathed. Businesses became faceless.

A friend once told me:

If a company and an employee cannot come to an agreement on terms (salary, benefits, etc.), it is on the company if the employee walks away.

I like that.

I like thinking that a company or organization has a role in retaining their employees. It’s not simply, “Hey, worker bee, this is what we’re offering you. Take it or leave it.” It is the organization taking initiative in seeing the value of their people.

Of course, not every employee brings value to an organization. But those who do (Seth Godin calls them a “linchpin“) need to have that value acknowledged. Part of that value comes in negotiations.

Unfortunately, most of companies would prefer to remain faceless and treat employees as replaceable. Most organizations would prefer to hide behind a long-standing rule or employee handbook. Most companies would prefer to blame “the organization” rather than treating their employees like human beings.

  • “We’d love to accommodate your request, unfortunately….”
  • “If we made an exception for you, we’d have to make it for everyone…”
  • “The employee handbook states….”

Here’s the thing: Most businesses are set up to be faceless. At the root of it is a desire to pass the buck. Financially and relationally. In the end, no one wants to be accountable.

SUBSCRIBE TO UPDATES + FREE EBOOK

Subscribe and receive my free ebook: "Top 10 Mistakes I Made With Social Media." Plus, you'll get exclusive access to giveaways, unreleased content, beta-testing opportunities, and sneak peeks as a member of my newsletter.

  • Choose Type
2 comments
Jesse Phillips
Jesse Phillips

absolutely! I agree! I wonder how this negotiation comes about? A major challenge for the employee is that leaving is not an easy thing to do. And from a Christian stand point, I feel we have a responsibility not to leave our boss in the lurch, but help them replace my position(at least that seems like a servant/loving kinda thing to do). But if they're taking advantage of us & not compensating properly, how do we leave in love? Or how do we threaten to leave, in love? (haha, but seriously). .-= Jesse Phillips´s last blog ..Alice & Benson Update from Kenya =-.

Justin Wise
Justin Wise

JESSE! Long time, no talk. Good to hear from you, bro. Love the question. Too often, I think people take up the "I'm taking my ball and going home!" mentality as employees. That's never helpful. I like how Seth Godin puts it in The Dip. He says to get a "plan of attack" in place well before any decisions have to be made. So, in an instance like this, you make it clear that in six months from now you'll be expecting such-and-such from so-and-so. If those expectations aren't met or negotiated, then it would be time to move on. But the key is having the plan in place and making sure all parties involved are aware of the situation well before any decisions need to be made. That way no one can claim ignorance. Is that helpful to you?